Dark poster banner for Canadian Ad Insider with bold white title, italic subtitle, and timeline bars at bottom across a black background and orange end marker? but without question marks

Ad- Grow My Agency

Heenan BlaikieYesterday morning, law firm Heenan Blaikie held their MAdLaw seminar which focused on the latest legal developments in areas including anti-spam, privacy, copyright and advertising to kids.  Here are some of the key points from the session:

User-generated & viral content

  • Upside: leverages consumer social networks
  • Downside: less control over the message

Viral Content: Risk Mitigation

  • Full compliance with all intellectual property laws is tough in user-generated contexts
  • Strict requirements will frustrate marketing objectives
  • Consumers will get frustrated with promotion and brand
  • They will voice that frustration too!
  • Developing strategies to head-offanticipated issues is key.

Viral Content: Risk Mitigation

  • Risk management often depends on consumer “investment” in the content
  • Examples of low investment
  • Take a photo of you and the product
  • Write the last line of a commercial
  • Examples of high investment
  • Shoot a video advertising our product
  • Any action involving time and skill

Basics of Copyright

  • There is no copyright in an idea,butonlyinthe expression of the idea.
  • Protection of original expression.
  • Protection for a limited time(life of author+50 years).

Case Study: Danone

  • Claimed Activia yogurt and DanActive probiotic drinks could prevent colds and relieve digestive issues
  • US Federal Trade Commission alleged the claims were exaggerated or not adequately supported
  • US settlement: $21 million
  • Canadian settlement: $1.7 million

Case Study: Reebok

  • Claimed that use of EasyTone shoes and apparel would result in toning and strengthening benefits
  • Plaintiffs alleged claims were false and misleading
  • US settlement: $25 million
  • Canadian settlement: $2.2 million

Case Study: The Brick

  • Quebec consumer rights group launched class action against The Brick
  • Alleged that The Brick’s “Do not pay for 15 months” ad claim was false, because the program required a $35 annual membership fee
  • The Brick agreed to pay $2 million settlement

Anti-spam, copyright, privacy and other legal issues related to advertising continues to be a growing concern for consumers, the Privacy Officer of Canada who has even challenged the world’s largest social network Facebook on their practices.  Fortunately companies such as eyeReturn are taking a proactive approach to ensure their advertising solution provide a balance between protecting consumers and advertisers can accurately target users.

[adrotate banner=”6″]


Join other professionals!

Get news, tips and other industry news delivered into your inbox. #1 source for breaking news about Canada's advertising and marketing industry.


About the author 

Dave Forde

Dave “The Connector” Forde is a 20-year veteran of the Canadian marketing, PR, and tech industries. He is the founder of The Connected One network, including industry news sites Canadian Ad Insider and PR In Canada, and serves as a strategic business advisor. Connect with him on LinkedIn and X.


Related Stories:

Popular Canadian Advertising Stories For Week Ending September 11, 2026

Why eos and Faulhaber Traded the Luxury Creator Trip for Canadian Summer Camp

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}
>